home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: darkstar.prodigy.com!davidsen
- From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Sportster V.34 4/95 ROM vs. V.34+ 10/95 ROM Performance?
- Date: 31 Jan 1996 23:47:44 GMT
- Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY
- Message-ID: <4eov30$1fag@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>
- References: <4dv1db$ar5@usenet2.interramp.com> <4e0sio$3j0@cynic.portal.ca> <Pine.LNX.3.91.960126003845.25196q-100000@inorganic5.chem.ufl.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: darkstar.prodigy.com
- Originator: davidsen@darkstar.prodigy.com
-
- In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.960126003845.25196q-100000@inorganic5.chem.ufl.edu>,
- Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net> wrote:
-
- | Why does USR continue with this "shoot myself in the foot" attitude of
- | releasing products without adaquate testing so the public can alpha test
- | their new gear, and then play dumb when we come back screaming about
- | defective hardware?? This is starting to look like the Spiral Death
- | Syndrome fiasco all over again. I suppose in 6 months USR will hold a
- | press conference and announce that a minor bug in the 10/18 firmware has
- | been fixed...and that it only affected a few users in minor ways.
-
- USR Sportster, the Pentium of modems.
- --
- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
- Too many improbable things have happened to me, both good and bad.
- I'm living on the edge of the bell shaped curve.
-